Skip to content
Product engineering studio

We build SaaS productsand AI systemscompanies depend on.

Codigence Labs partners with founders and engineering leaders to take products from first architecture decision to production scale: SaaS platforms, AI agents, and the cloud infrastructure underneath them.

Products shipped
20+Products shipped
Median team experience
6 yrsMedian team experience
Platform uptime
98.98%Platform uptime
DASHBOARDSAIINTEGRATIONSARCHITECTURECODECLOUD

▸ Six layers, one system. Hover or tab through a node to inspect it

Trusted by teams building

  • Fintech platform
  • Logistics network
  • Healthcare SaaS
  • Developer tooling
  • Retail intelligence
  • Enterprise AI
What we build

Twelve product shapes we've shipped more than once.

Most engagements are a variation on one of these. If yours isn't here, it's usually because it's a combination of two.

AI Agents

Tool-calling agents with typed schemas, retry semantics, and eval suites, not prompt chains that break in production.

MCP Servers

Model Context Protocol servers exposing your internal systems to Claude and other clients, with scoped auth per tool.

Enterprise SaaS

Multi-tenant, SSO, RBAC, audit trails, SOC2-ready from day one.

B2B Platforms

Complex domain models, approval flows, and reporting at scale.

Workflow Automation

Durable, idempotent orchestration with full replay and audit.

Voice AI

Sub-second pipelines on Pipecat, Vapi, and ElevenLabs.

AI Chatbots

RAG with citations, evaluation sets, and refusal guardrails.

Developer Platforms

SDKs, docs, sandboxes, and API versioning that won't break clients.

Marketplaces

Two-sided, payments, escrow, trust & safety.

Internal Tools

Ops consoles that replace fragile spreadsheets.

Customer Portals

Self-serve billing, usage, and support.

Admin Dashboards

Real-time analytics over ClickHouse.

Services

The whole lifecycle, under one roof.

Staffing vendors sell a phase. We cover discovery through scaling, because the handoffs between those phases are where products usually break.

10 disciplines

  • 01
    • Problem framing
    • Technical feasibility
    • Scope & sequencing
    • Architecture RFC
  • 02
    • Design system
    • Interaction specs
    • Prototypes
    • Accessibility review
  • 03
    • React / Next.js / Angular
    • Design system build
    • Performance budgets
    • E2E coverage
  • 04
    • Domain modelling
    • API design
    • Event architecture
    • Data migrations
  • 05
    • Agent architecture
    • RAG & retrieval
    • MCP servers
    • Eval harnesses
  • 06
    • AWS / GCP / Azure
    • Cost modelling
    • Multi-region
    • Disaster recovery
  • 07
    • IaC with Terraform
    • CI/CD pipelines
    • Kubernetes / ECS
    • Progressive rollout
  • 08
    • Test strategy
    • Automation suites
    • Load & soak testing
    • Release gates
  • 09
    • On-call rotation
    • SLOs & error budgets
    • Dependency hygiene
    • Incident reviews
  • 10
    • Bottleneck analysis
    • Query & cache tuning
    • Sharding & partitioning
    • Capacity planning

Tap a discipline for deliverables

How we work

Five stages. No surprises in month three.

Every engagement runs the same shape, whether it's an eight-week MVP or a two-year platform rebuild. The durations move; the sequence doesn't.

  1. 011–2 weeks

    Discover

    We pressure-test the problem before writing code. Constraints, users, integrations, and the failure modes that matter.

    • Architecture RFC
    • Scoped roadmap
    • Risk register
  2. 022–3 weeks

    Design

    Interface and system design in parallel, so what gets designed is what can actually be built.

    • Design system
    • API contracts
    • Data model
  3. 036–16 weeks

    Build

    Two-week cycles, trunk-based, behind flags. You see working software every fortnight, not a status deck.

    • Fortnightly releases
    • Test coverage
    • Live staging
  4. 041–2 weeks

    Launch

    Progressive rollout with observability wired before the first real user arrives, not after the first incident.

    • Runbooks
    • Dashboards & alerts
    • Rollback plan
  5. 05Ongoing

    Scale

    Load grows, requirements change. We tune, harden, and extend. Or we hand over cleanly to your in-house team.

    • SLO reporting
    • Cost optimisation
    • Team handover
Technology & expertise

Grouped by capability, not by logo.

A list of technologies proves nothing on its own. What matters is which layer each one belongs to and why it was chosen, so that's how this is organised.

8 groups · 84 capabilities
AI & Intelligent Systems

Agents that call real tools against real systems, with evaluation loops and cost ceilings from the first commit.

  • AI Agents
  • Multi-Agent Systems
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP)
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic Claude
  • Google Gemini
  • LangGraph
  • CrewAI
  • AutoGen
  • Pipecat
  • Vapi
  • ElevenLabs
  • RAG Systems
  • Vector Databases
  • AI Workflows
  • Prompt Engineering
  • Tool Calling
  • Memory Systems
  • Voice AI
  • Computer Vision
Selected work

Three problems, and what we actually did.

Client names are withheld under NDA, so these are described by profile. The architecture and the numbers are the parts that matter anyway.

Series B · FintechSingapore

A multi-agent reconciliation platform replacing 40 hours a week of manual review

Finance operations reconciled payment exceptions by hand across four ledgers. Volume had tripled in a year, the queue was permanently two days behind, and every new market added another spreadsheet.

94%
Auto-resolved
38 hrs
Saved weekly
11 wks
To production

Architecture

  1. Supervisor
  2. Ledger tool
  3. Rules engine
  4. Human queue
  5. Audit log
Enterprise · LogisticsNetherlands

An MCP server exposing thirty years of legacy systems to AI clients

Operational knowledge sat behind a mainframe, two Oracle databases, and a SOAP gateway written in 2004. Every AI initiative stalled at the same place: there was no safe way to let a model read that data, and no appetite for a big-bang migration..

34
MCP tools exposed
Faster integration
0
Legacy systems replaced

Architecture

  1. MCP server
  2. Auth scope
  3. Mainframe
  4. Oracle
  5. SOAP gateway
Scale-up · Healthcare SaaSUnited States

Re-architecting a single-tenant product into multi-tenant SaaS without downtime

The product ran as 60 separate single-tenant deployments. Every release took nine days, onboarding a hospital took six weeks of manual provisioning, and infrastructure cost scaled linearly with customers.

99.98%
Uptime through migration
61%
Infra cost reduction
4 hrs
Tenant onboarding

Architecture

  1. Routing layer
  2. Tenant context
  3. RLS policies
  4. Shared cluster
  5. Audit stream
Why Codigence

What we actually believe about building software.

Four positions we hold, including the ones that occasionally cost us work.

We own outcomes, not tickets

A staffing vendor delivers the tickets you write. We take responsibility for whether the product works, which means pushing back on requirements, flagging the architecture decision you'll regret, and saying no to the feature that will cost more than it earns. That's uncomfortable more often than it's convenient, and it's the entire difference.

Architecture is a business decision

Choosing CQRS, or a monolith, or a managed queue over a self-hosted one is not a technical preference. It's a bet on how the company will change over five years. We make those bets explicitly, write down the reasoning, and record what would have to be true to revisit them.

Senior engineers only, on your problem

No pyramid. No junior developers learning your domain on your budget while a manager relays status. The people in the discovery call are the people writing the code, and they stay on the engagement. Median team experience is nine years.

Boring where it counts

We build genuinely novel things: multi-agent systems, MCP servers, sub-second voice pipelines. We build them on unglamorous, well-understood foundations: PostgreSQL, typed contracts, infrastructure as code, tests that actually run. Novelty belongs in the product, not the plumbing.

Client feedback

What partners say afterwards.

They killed two features in the first week and explained exactly why. I'd never had an engineering partner argue us out of scope before. It's the reason I trusted everything they said afterwards.

Co-founder & CTOSeries B fintech · Singapore

Testimonial 1 of 4

Start here

Ready to build your next product?

Bring us an idea, a stalled build, or a system that needs to scale. A discovery call is 45 minutes, costs nothing, and you leave with an architectural point of view either way.

45 minutes · No sales deck · NDA on request